By JOAQUIM MARTÍ MARTÍ Lawyer. Barbados Email Lists Collaborating Professor Civil Law. University of Barcelona The execution of works in the interest of a Community of Owners may encounter opposition by an owner of the occupation of part of his terrace for the placement of the necessary scaffolding Barbados Email Lists for that purpose. The jurisprudence resolves the conflict between private property and the community interest with the imposition of a temporary easement. The placement of scaffolding and the passage of workers in a private element can come, then, from the judicial imposition of an easement.
A different solution will be the deprivation of a private space
A different solution will be the deprivation of a private Barbados Email Lists space for the placement of the elevator on the property. This article studies the problem and the judicial solution to the easements derived from horizontal property. I.- Statement of the question. The problem is originated Barbados Email Lists and caused by the, increasingly frequent, community intervention in the rehabilitation of facades, structural works and improvements in buildings. These community interventions find the first difficulty in the approval of said agreements Barbados Email Lists by the Boards of Owners and once the agreements with the pertinent “quorum” have been approved, in the timely distribution Barbados Email Lists of the budget
among the owners that make up the Community Barbados Email Lists and that they pay attention to the quotas drawn for that extraordinary performance. But once the Communities of Owners have overcome the legal and economic difficulties for the execution of the works in common interest, the ultimate Barbados Email Lists difficulty arises or may arise, consisting of the refusal of the neighbor-owner of the Barbados Email Lists mezzanine or attic, to let the operators pass for the execution of the works or the placement of the scaffolding on its Barbados Email Lists terrace for exclusive use. In this case, the Community of Owners finds that the refusal of access to the house by an owner may completely
